Journal of South Architecture

Public Perception of South China Historical Trails: A Case Study of Xijing Historical Trail

LIZiming (The Innovation School of Greater Bay Area, Guangzhou Academy of Fine Arts), WANGShifu (School of Architecture, South China University of Technology; State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building and Urban Science), YIZhikang (Guangzhou Urban Planning and Design Company Limited), LIUZheng (School of Architecture, South China University of Technology; State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building and Urban Science)

Abstract


The South China Historical Trails are being upgraded as a key aspect of new policies towards rural vitalization and targeted poverty alleviation. As an important example of linear cultural heritage, it is widely examined by local and international scholars. However, the effectiveness of their adaptive reuse is rarely evaluated due to the trails’extensive distribution, different construction contexts, and the diversity of users. In this study, the multiple benefits of adaptively reusing Xijing Historical Trail were investigated from the perspective of public perception through a case study based on the Ruyuan Section. A multiple linear regression model was applied. It is assumed that the public perception of the multiple benefits from the adaptive reuse of the South China Historical Trails would correspond with the planning objectives and expectations. Public perception was divided into three dimensions: Cultural inheritance, site usage, and economic promotion. A questionnaire survey based on a Likert scale was conducted at fixed places, supplemented by structured household questionnaire interviews in the village. A total of 230 questionnaires were collected. Results demonstrated that respondents’overall evaluation of the South China Historical Trails was positive, but they only had a vague understanding of specific functions such as cultural inheritance and economic promotion. There is a significant positive correlation between respondents’overall satisfaction and cognition of multiple benefits. According to further multiple linear regression model fitting, the regression equation between multiple benefit perception and overall satisfaction of respondents has explanatory power. As the linear heritage corridor and cultural path that carry special historical and cultural values, the South China Historical Trails are different from other recreational trails. However, this study found that site usage makes a greater contribution to improvement in respondents’satisfaction than cultural inheritance and economic promotion. To fully strengthen the cultural inheritance benefits of the South China Historical Trails, their functions of historical protection, cultural education, and recreation should be fully integrated to improve the site usage experience’s comfort and interest. Meanwhile, it is necessary to explore effective ways of economic promotion in conditional and potential areas. In addition, the adaptive reuse of such heritage requires long-term, comprehensive, and multistakeholder participation and continuous investment. From this perspective, the adaptive reuse of the Ruyuan Section of Xijing Historical Trail as the South China Historical Trails is still in the early exploration stage. The full realization of its cultural, economic, and social benefits must be verified over a longer period. Based on this analysis, some specific improvement suggestions were proposed for the Ruyuan Section of Xijing Historical Trail: (1) Strengthen status maintenance, adopt an asset-light investment strategy, and optimize the historical trail network continuously. (2) Deepen historical exploration and show local characteristics by combining with the culture of the Yao Nationality. (3) Strengthen industrial planning, promote multiple participation, and perfect the relevant industrial chains. Moreover, some potential goals for the overall adaptive reuse of the South China Historical Trails were proposed: (1) Create activity-friendly designs and optimize the space by orienting to different activity preferences. (2) Implement low-cost, easy-maintenance, and inclusive strategies oriented towards sustainable long-term governance. (3) Explore historical connotations, highlight cultural heritage, and ensure sustained investment in fundamental research.

Keywords


linear cultural heritage; cultural routes; South China Historical Trails; public attitude; public recognition; multiple benefits; improvement strategies

Full Text:

PDF

References


Lv Z. Culture Routes: a new category of world heritage. Chinese Heritage. 2006;(1):11-13.

Shan JX. Preliminary discussion of large linear heritage preservation: Breakthrough and pressure. Cultural Relics in Southern China. 2006;(3):2-5.

Wang ZF, Sun P. Heritage Corridors: a comparatively new protection and conservation method of heritage. Chinese Landscape Architecture. 2001;(5):86-89.

Guo X, Yang HX. Comparisons on the concept of Cultural Routes: the different ideas among UNESCO World Heritage Committee, ICOMOS and European Institute of Cultural Routes. Journal of Human Settlements in West China. 2015;30(2):44-48.

Liu J. The new idea of the cultural heritage conservation: the primary discussion of the Trinity ’s Conservation Mode of Linear Cultural Heritage. Southeast Culture. 2011;(2):19-24.

Yu KJ, Xi XS, Li DH, Li HL, Liu K. On the construction of the National Linear Culture Heritage Network in China. Human Geography. 2009;24(3):11-16, 116.

Liu DQ. Tourism development of the Linear Cultural Heritage of Jinghang Canal: with the tourism development of Xingtai Section of Canal as an example. China Ancient City. 2009;(11):43-46.

Li ZX, Chen LJ, Zhou HQ. Based on Linear Cultural Heritage for the protected mode research of Shu Dao: a case study of Jianmen Shudao. China Ancient City. 2016;(4):72-77, 35.

Department of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the Guangdong Province. The conservation and activation utilization of South China Historical Trail. South Architecture. 2017; (6):4.

Chen DG. On the characteristics of traffic development in south of the Five Ridges in historical period. Journal of Chinese Historical Geography. 1991;(3):75-95.

Liang GZ, Tang GL, Li XL. Ancient post roads in the Nanling Mountains. Tropical Geography. 2018;38(3):356-363.

Pan Y, Fang Y Z, Shi Y. Comparative study of traditional settlement landscapes along key lines of historical trail in North Guangdong. Landscape Architecture. 2020;27(1):83-89.

Wang LL, Zhang HQ, Xu YM. Analysis of tourism value evaluation system of ancient post roads in Southern Guangdong based on analytic hierarchy process: taking Ruyuan Section of Xijing ancient post road as an example. China Market. 2019;(4):19-22.

Xu RS. Reuse of linear heritage space: a case study of Beijing Tianjin Hebei Section of China’s Grand Canal and South China Historical Trails. China Cultural Heritage. 2016;(5):76-87.

Cao J. The fragrance of grass overruns the ancient road and its greenness invades desolate towns: heritage values, conservation and re-use of the Xijing Ancient Postal Road. Heritage Architecture. 2019;(2):59-64.

Wang SF, Li ZM. The spatial strategic thinking on the cultural Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macau Greater Bay Area based on cultural routes system and effects. South Architecture. 2019;(6):39-45.

Zeng XC, Li P, Lv M. Transboundary design in promoting activation and utilization of historical and cultural heritage: case study of Taishan Station on the background of South China Historical Trail Creative Contest. South Architecture. 2017;(6):13-17.

Xie WY, Feng JX, Wu Q, et al. Research on the effect of “Building Villages with Roads” of ancient post roads in South Guangdong based on villagers ’perception: taking Lanzhai Village, Yunfu City, as an example. Journal of Zhaoqing University. 2020; 41(1):14-20.

Wu XL. Study on the image perception of ancient post road tourist attractions in Southern Guangdong from the perspective of data frootprint: taking the ancient post road in Heyuan, Guangdong and Jiangxi as an example. Science Technology and Industry. 2020;20(6):64-68.

Nunkoo R, Ramkissoon H. Power, trust, social exchange and community support. Annals of Tourism Research. 2012; 39 (2): 997-1203.

Cheng SW, Zhang XM, Hu J. Study on residents ’tourism perception and participation willingness in Shennongjia National Park. Chinese Landscape Architecture. 2018;34(10):103-107.

Zhao N, Liu Z, Lin Y, Meulder DB. User, public, and professional perceptions of the greenways in the Pearl River Delta, China. Sustainability. 2019;11(24):7211.

Turner RH. The public perception of protest. American Sociological Review. 1969:815-831.

Savadori L, Savio S, Nicotra E. Rumiati R, Finucane M, Slovic P. Expert and public perception of risk from biotechnology. Risk Analysis: An International Journal. 2004;24(5):1289-1299.

Adashi EY, Cohen J, Hamberger L, Jones HW Jr, de Kretser DM, Lunenfeld B. Public perception on infertility and its treatment: an international survey. Human reproduction. 2000;15(2):330-334.

Goodfellow MJ, Williams HR, Azapagic A. Nuclear renaissance, public perception and design criteria: an exploratory review. Energy policy. 2011;39(10):6199-6210.

Dyer P, Gursoy D, Sharma B, Carter JL. Structural modeling of resident perceptions of tourism and associated development on the Sunshine Coast, Australia. Tourism Management. 2007;28(2): 409-422.

Liu T, He M, Wang YX, Yan YQ. Comprehensive evaluation on the satisfaction for Water Park in Tianjin with the AHP and Kano Model. Journal of Shandong Agricultural University (Natural Science Edition) . 2016;47(3):417-424.

Liang C, Zeng J. Research on optimization of walking environment in historical district based on importance-performance analysis:a case study of the Five Avenues, Tianjin. Modern Urban Research. 2019;(2):54-59.

Culture, Broadcasting, Tourism and Sports Bureau of Ruyuan Countyof Shaoguan City. Conservation and inheritance of key routes ( Ruyuan Section) of Xijing Ancient Road in Shaoguan. Ruyuan County: Culture, Broadcasting, Tourism and Sports Bureau of Ruyuan County of Shaoguan City; 2020.

Leung, SO. A comparison of psychometric properties and normality in 4-, 5-, 6-, and 11-point Likert scales. Journal of Social Service Research. 2011;37(4):412-421.

Liu Z, Lin Y, De Meulder B, Wang S. Can greenways perform as a new planning strategy in the Pearl River Delta? Landscape and Urban Planning. 2019;187:81-95.

Liu Z, Lin Y, Chung CKL. Regional governance for greenways in China:A control rights perspective. Journal of Urban Affairs. 2024:1-19.

Liu Z, Lin Y, De Meulder B, Wang S. Heterogeneous landscapes of urban greenways in Shenzhen traffic impact, corridor width and land use. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 2020;55:12678.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.33142/jsa.v3i2.19692

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Ziming LI, Shifu WANG, Zhikang YI, Zheng LIU

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

ISSN: 3029-2336 | Jointly published by Viser Technology Pte. Ltd. and Editorial Department of Southern Architecture